13/01/2006, 15:00 — 16:00 — Room P4.35, Mathematics Building
Scott Aaronson, U Waterloo
Quantum Versus Classical Proofs And Advice
Quantum computing skeptics have claimed that any theory involving exponentially-long vectors is inherently unreasonable. But if someone hands you a quantum state, is that really like being handed an exponential amount of classical information? I will describe recent results suggesting that the answer, at least for complexity-theoretic purposes, is "no". These results include simulations of quantum advice using classical advice, and a conditional "dequantization" of John Watrous' quantum proof protocol for the Group Non-Membership problem. Based partly on joint work with Greg Kuperberg.
![Hyperlink to the session link](/img/link.png)
Supported by: Phys-Info (IT), SQIG (IT), CeFEMA and CAMGSD, with funding from FCT, FEDER and EU FP7, specifically through the Doctoral Programme in the Physics and Mathematics of Information (DP-PMI), FCT strategic projects PEst-OE/EEI/LA0008/2013 and UID/EEA/50008/2013, IT project QuSim, project CRUP-CPU CQVibes, the FP7 Coordination Action QUTE-EUROPE (600788), and the FP7 projects Landauer (GA 318287) and PAPETS (323901).
![Instituto de Telecomunicações Instituto de Telecomunicações](/seminars/qci/img/it.png)
![CAMGSD](/img/logo_CAMGSD_new.svg)
![FCT](/img/2017_FCT_H_cor.svg)
![7th Framework Programme](/img/7thFP_small_trans.png)