07/03/2013, 02:30 — 03:30 — Room P3.10, Mathematics Building
Bob Oliver, Université Paris XIII
Local equivalences between finite Lie groups
Fix a prime . Two finite groups and will be called
-locally equivalent if there is an isomorphism from a Sylow
-subgroup of to a Sylow -subgroup of which
preserves all conjugacy relations between elements and subgroups of
and .
Martino and Priddy proved that if the -completed classifying
spaces and are homotopy equivalent, then and
are -locally equivalent. They also conjectured the converse, a
result which has since been proven, but only by using the
classification theorem of finite simple groups.
Anyone who works much with finite groups of Lie type (such as
linear, symplectic, or orthogonal groups over finite fields)
notices that there are many cases of -local equivalences between
them. For example, if and are two prime powers such that
and have the same 2-adic valuation, then
and are 2-locally equivalent.
In joint work with Carles Broto and Jesper Møller, we proved,
among other results, the following very general theorem about such
-local equivalences between finite Lie groups.
Theorem: Fix a prime , a connected, reductive
group scheme over , and a pair of prime powers and
both prime to . Then and are -locally
equivalent if as closed subgroups of .
Our proof of this theorem is topological: we show that the
-completed classifying spaces have the same homotopy type, and
then apply the theorem of Martino and Priddy mentioned above. The
starting point is a theorem of Friedlander, which describes the
space as a “homotopy fixed space” of a some self map
of of a certain type (an “unstable Adams operation”).
This is combined with a theorem of Jackowski, McClure, and Oliver
that classifies more precisely the self maps of ; and with
a result of Broto, Møller, and Oliver which says that under
certain hypotheses on a space , the homotopy fixed space of a
self equivalence of depends (up to homotopy type) only on
the closed subgroup in the group
of all homotopy classes of self equivalences of .
Currently, no other proof seems to be known of this purely
algebraic theorem.